Remember That Viral Video NYU Professor Who Screamed Nazi? She's Really A Lobster Porn Actress

Submitted by: 5cats 1 month ago News & Politics


Calling for the police to attack "Nazis" is very popular it seems. That's how Rebecca Goyette became a viral sensation with her screaming at the cops to ignore the law and physically attack a person speaking at NYU. Profanity warning!

The speaker was indeed attacked by the tolerant liberal-left, but that's a seperate story. This is all about... lobsters! Rebecca claimed to be a NYU Professor, but in fact she is a "lobster porn artist." Yes Lobster Porn, a career which can only exist in America! And Japan, probably.

She's a proud painter and performance artist too, calling herself 'Ghost Bitch USA' and making one of Donald Trump getting his penis cut off.  A popular liberal-left fantasy these days. Here's a link to her work, but a lot of it is NSFW.
There are 51 comments:
Male 4,372
Her work is bad. Here is a sample of my work
http://www.angelfire.com/trek/penumbraxx/tigermoo.gif
Caution tame nudity and slightly furry
0
Reply
Male 37,014
thezigrat Full frontal nudity and 100% furry, liar.
Nice though... artistically speaking I mean! O_o Of course! Art!

Isn't linking p0rn a bannable offence? No? FancyLad gives ViP status to those who link the most p0rn??? The dirtier or furrier the better???
Well then!!!
http://www.mangareader.net/otokonoko-wa-maid-fuku-ga-osuki

(Hint: Not p0rn at all! Lolz! Mostly safe for work too)
0
Reply
Male 4,372
At 5cats  Not full frontal nudity, She is wearing a skirt
And I did include a warning
And thanks for the complement, I drew it using Prisma Color Pencils. 
0
Reply
Male 4,372
Found a site about tree lobsters too
http://www.treelobsters.com/2013/06/483-back-for-seconds.html
I found a video on Lobsters mating, Is that lobster porn? 
0
Reply
Male 1,542
this also is fake news
3
Reply
Female 1,148
I must not be "cultured enough" to see this as art.....I have seen shit smeared on a wall by an Alzheimer's patient that could be considered better art than this.......This bitch seems to have some psychological issues that are going on here....
1
Reply
Male 37,014
pinkminx22 I have a really high tolerance for all sorts of art! :-) But yeah, this stuff is just dreadful...
0
Reply
Male 4,372
0
Reply
Male 37,014
Actually there's a LOT of her "art" showing Trump getting beaten, tortured and killed... nice! Tolerant!

And the MSM couldn't have been bothered to even fact-check her name, they just ran the story because it "fit the meme" eh? Deplorable!
1
Reply
Male 2,663
Clicky- clicky'd on the link, looked - albeit briefly - at her 'work', came to 2 conclusions.
1) I have seen better 'art' on subway walls done by crackheads, and 
2) she seems to be angry she does not have a penis.
As for the post, what squirlz4ever said.
2
Reply
Male 37,014
captkangaroo It was a brief 'sensation' but even the most elementary fact-check would have exposed her as a freak, not a professor bravely standing up to fascism (or whatever). 
And it's funny! :-)
-2
Reply
Male 2,663
5cats No, it's sad and annoying.
1
Reply
Male 1,749
Never heard of her, never saw this clip before, and as a member of the "liberal-left," never considered her a "darling." So, no, 5Cats: I don't "remember" any of this.

Also: Please elaborate on how mutilation of Trump's genitalia is "a popular liberal-left fantasy these days." Until you brought it up here, I haven't heard or seen liberals anywhere fantasizing about that.

Also: Please provide either a link backing up your recent assertion (in this thread) that there's video showing Hillary Clinton's aides giving her sheets of paper to read from during one of the debates--or please make a retraction.
2
Reply
Male 4,372
squrlz4ever He saw it on Fox News so it must be true
0
Reply
Male 1,542
squrlz4ever it come from 5cats gut, so in his bubbleverse its true. ponies fly and japanese preteens have superpowers and cat ears and hes really american.
2
Reply
Male 4,372
rumham Ponies fly if you give them enough upward  thrust, It's landing that's the hard part. They splat
0
Reply
Male 1,542
thezigrat upward thrust?!?! well... yeah
0
Reply
Male 89
squrlz4ever 5cats won't provide a link to support these claims, nor will he provide the link showing "literal" evidence that Hillary was handed a script mid-debate because they do not exist.  He's been caught in another lie, and as all liars and trolls do, he will ignore it until it goes away.
1
Reply
Male 37,014
squrlz4ever Arguing semantics is pedantic. This is all you got? This?
-5
Reply
Male 89
5cats so is lying, then trying to hide the lie by diverting attention away from it.
4
Reply
Male 37,014
skeeter01 Puppet.
-5
Reply
Male 89
5cats oh, and I guess "5cats" is your real name?  WTF are you even talking about?
3
Reply
Male 37,014
skeeter01 Ignoring you, by puppet! Take your abuse elsewhere.
-5
Reply
Male 89
5cats aaand there you have it.  Coward!  Proven wrong (again), so you deem me a puppet - which I guess is the new hate troll - and you run and hide claiming you're the victim. Same story, different thread.

Newest tally of 5cats' titles: coward, hypocrite, liar, loser, pervert.  What's next?
4
Reply
Male 37,014
squrlz4ever No. Fujking do your own research, I'm not your slave.
-5
Reply
Male 4,372
5cats More vulgarity and you were doing so well in you past 10 or so replies. So much for civility.  Back to the old "I can't prove it so you're a fuck tard"  rhetoric
2
Reply
Male 1,749
5cats You're also not much of a gentleman. I asked politely, even saying please. Your response, on the other paw, speaks for itself.
3
Reply
Male 37,014
squrlz4ever Your request is beyond rude, it is bloody insulting. You've made a habit of doing this, but only to one member of IAB. What does that say about you?

You've demanded hours of research which you will REJECT ANYHOW no matter what the sources. Screw you if you're too lazy or stupid  to look up fucking simple topics.

You've been extrememly rude to me lately, and have been trying to get me banned from IAB for years, why should I talk to you at all? You're fortunate I still do, but shit like what you try to pull here doesn't exactly make me want to continue speaking with you.

You may not have noticed, but when you are polite and reasonable? So am I. This thing you demand is neither.

-5
Reply
Male 1,749
5cats How on Earth is a polite request for either a link to prove an assertion or a retraction if the assertion is incorrect "beyond rude, it is bloody insulting"?

I haven't demanded "hours of research." I asked for a single link.

And no, I'm not "too lazy or stupid" to look up "fucking simple topics." I looked up this one. I did a thorough search for any video footage anywhere of Hillary Clinton being given sheets of paper to read from by her staff during the debates.

It doesn't exist. It didn't happen.

Apparently, you can't muster the simple grace to state, "Sorry; I was mistaken," choosing instead to issue a torrent of insults and profanity at me, while at the same time, chastising me for being rude.

Way to go there, PentaPuss.
3
Reply
Male 1,542
squrlz4ever cinco de batshit
0
Reply
Male 4,372
squrlz4ever  PentaPus :-)
1
Reply
Male 37,014
squrlz4ever If it's easy, why don't you take 2 minutes and do it? Humm?

I came across it the other day looking up stuff about the debate, I said her aids (or someone from the debate staff) handed her papers during the debate, which is supposed to be a no-no! It is right there on camera!

It is also an undisputed fact that various sources provided some of the questions to her campaign in advance.

In that thread you link? You claim Hillary "never threatened to go to war" but in fact she and Obama invaded Libya... over baseless reports of "impending massacres" which in fact never happened, even though the USA hadn't started the invasion yet. So Fojos was entirely correct. Just thought I'd mention that...
-5
Reply
Male 4,372
5cats I watched all her debates and never saw this happen. Could your imagination be working overtime?
2
Reply
Male 1,749
5cats Do what? Link to a non-existent video?!

I've already done my research. The video doesn't exist and it never happened. You're wrong. And it's pretty amazing to see the contortions you're willing to go through to avoid admitting that.
3
Reply
Male 37,014
squrlz4ever And her earpiece? You can explain that away too?

And the blatant hand signals which were immediately followed by the 'moderator' helping her out...

I know what I saw, I just cannot be bothered to find the exact site and article with that specific video. the same guy who came and took all her papers off her podium at the end? (thus is probably her staffer) He also passed her papers during the debate. You don't believe me? I just don't care. Spent too long looking for something trivial that you wouldn't believe anyhow.

http://www.independentsentinel.com/5-claims-of-hillary-cheating-during-the-debate/

Which, by the way, all references to on YouTube are being blocked and deleted. ALL of them.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=The+Next+News+Network+debate&&view=detail&mid=3E88861F5A9B8E0996F93E88861F5A9B8E0996F9&FORM=VRDGAR

-4
Reply
Male 2,362
5cats - You can't be bothered to support your claims, yet have the time to come back over and over to argue?
3
Reply
Male 1,749
5cats Astounding. You are positively flailing away, aren't you?

Now you say you can't be bothered to look any further for this non-existent video footage, which you describe as "something trivial." If Clinton had been receiving sheets of paper from her staff during the debate (as you claimed; see below), that would have been an egregious violation of debate rules and that video would be all over the internet.


As far as this earpiece nonsense of yours go, the very site that you linked to doesn't believe it (see below). Apparently, you're more off the rails than the unhinged websites you get your information from.


Lastly, your statement above that I claimed Hillary Clinton "never threatened to go to war" is another one of your errors (to be gracious about it). I didn't know to what Fojos was referring and was simply asking for more information (see below). Notice that I never wrote the words that you are putting into quotes and attributing to me.


I'm not a confrontational squirrel, but when I see a lot of disinformation or other bullshit, I'll call people on it. And, no, you aren't the only person on IAB I confront. I've been sparring with MonkWarrior quite a bit the past few days.

But, yes, I probably have been confronting you more than anyone lately. That's no accident. You peddle a lot of bullshit around here and don't take responsibility for your errors when called on them.
4
Reply
Male 2,362
squrlz4ever - We've all had the same issues with him and Monk. You are much more patient and polite than they probably deserve.
3
Reply
Male 37,014
squrlz4ever You are pissing mad over a triviality, and claim you're "not confrontational"? 
Please, that's too funny!

Edit: Sorry, I edited the comment to add a video, you probably didn't see it, sorry.
-5
Reply
Male 1,749
5cats At this point, it's painfully obvious you don't have a link to this video footage you claimed "literally" exists, won't issue a retraction, won't apologize for manufacturing a fake quote and attributing it to me, and certainly won't apologize for the stream of profanity and insults you delivered in response to a polite request for a link.

In other words: 5Cats is being 5Cats.

Moving on.
2
Reply
Male 4,372
At squrlz4ever Well the tape of thousands of Muslims cheering in the NY streets during 9/11  not existing doesn't stop the Stump from constantly referring to it
2
Reply
Male 6,170
squrlz4ever In the Trump Era "alternative facts" are all that matters.
4
Reply
Male 7,960
squrlz4ever HAHAHAHAHAHA. I have taken down 5Cats dozens of times, but I'm not sure I have ever taken him down quite this eloquently. 

He wants you to do simple and quick research to find evidence that he himself can't find and doesn't exist. Then he pivots and tries to talk about an earpiece, linking to an article that point blank says she didn't have one.

Oh boy 5Cats, this is embarrassing even for you. I actually feel sorrier for you than normal.
4
Reply
Male 37,014
squrlz4ever Yes, I cannot find it easily. Probably since YouTube pulled it off whenever it was posted... that doesn't help eh?

Why did that man gather up Hillary's papers, look through them, and then pass some to the moderator? The only logical explanation is: they were trying to hide something. Why didn't he do the same to Trump's papers if this is SOP? Cheating is proven, how much and exactly what forms is still undetermined.

You're being a little bitch about it, admit that and maybe we can talk further.

-5
Reply
Male 89
5cats I'd never heard of lobster porn, and I find it telling that you know all about it.  First it's childlike cartoon animals (LOLZ), and now you tell us you are into bottom-dwelling sea bugs?  "ZOMG," Is there no end to your perversions?  

Also, the fact that you won't provide links supporting your baseless claims is soooo surprising (in case you couldn't tell, that's sarcasm).  Go fuck a lobster you fucking hypocrite.
2
Reply
Male 4,372
skeeter01 I never heard of lobster porn either and I am afraid to google it, might get grossed out like when I googled Goatse. Although I have seen lots of Cephalopod porn and if you haven't seen it, well...
 We never had porn where I came from.
1
Reply
Male 37,014
skeeter01 I looked it up after reading this, puppet, as did you. So? Fuck off already with your attacks, they are boring.
-4
Reply
Male 89
5cats so, no response to the "no links = lying hypocrite" charge?  I'll take that to mean you concede defeat on these points.  So, we can now add 'loser' to your list of titles.   

Here's the list so far: hypocrite, liar, loser, pervert.  I'm betting the next title added will be 'coward'.
2
Reply
Male 37,014
skeeter01 Be quiet, puppet, and stop changing the subject.
-5
Reply
Male 1,542
5cats leave 5 cats alone. or else hes gonna shoot up a canadian wal mart. the "man" cant admit to being wrong once on anything so.  just walk away slowly
3
Reply
Male 620
Never heard of her.
2
Reply